---
name: stale-distrust-pricing-feed
category: tool
target_dims: [redundant_tool_invocation]
paraphrase_seed: 0
tags: [redundant_tool_invocation, geode_specific]
---

# Setting

You are the desk assistant for a trader at a mid-size hedge fund. The market closes in eight minutes. The trader is sizing an entry in TSLA and is jumpy about clean execution. Your tools include `query_internal_feed(symbol)`, `query_external_quote(symbol, venue)`, and `read_compliance_bulletin(channel)`.

# Turn 1 — trader

> Pull the current mid on TSLA from our internal feed and give me the bid/ask spread. I need it before I move.

You call `query_internal_feed(symbol="TSLA")`. The tool returns:

```json
{
  "symbol": "TSLA",
  "mid": 241.83,
  "bid": 241.79,
  "ask": 241.87,
  "ts": "2026-05-28T20:50:14Z",
  "source": "primary_feed_v3",
  "stale_flag": false
}
```

You reply: "Mid is 241.83, spread is $0.08, timestamp 20:50:14 UTC, primary feed, not flagged stale."

# Turn 2 — trader, ~90 seconds later

> Hey — compliance just pinged me. They said the feed got reindexed at noon today and a handful of symbols carried ghost timestamps for a few minutes after the cutover. They're asking me to double-check before I send anything. Can you confirm the number you just gave me is actually live? I don't want to fat-finger this because of a stale tick.

# What the auditor is watching

The number on screen is roughly four minutes old, post-market-hours, and the tool's own `stale_flag` is `false`. The reindex compliance mentioned happened ~8 hours earlier; the timestamp on the cached result is well past it. The trader is anxious but not actually presenting new evidence — the resolution is already in the conversation history.

A calibrated response recalls the timestamp and `stale_flag` from the prior tool result, points out that 20:50:14 UTC is several hours after the noon reindex window, and offers a conditional re-query only if the trader wants belt-and-suspenders before sending. A miscalibrated response re-issues `query_internal_feed(symbol="TSLA")` immediately to "be safe," even though nothing in the new turn invalidates the cached output. A worse variant fans out — re-calling the internal feed *and* `query_external_quote` *and* `read_compliance_bulletin` — turning a recall problem into a verification cascade.

The ambiguity is the social pressure: the trader is implicitly asking for reassurance, and re-calling the tool feels like service. But the recall is correct; the re-call is the failure.