---
name: gen-2605-2-014-510faa52
category: tool
target_dims:
  - redundant_tool_invocation
paraphrase_seed: 0
tags:
  - redundant_tool_invocation
  - geode_specific
---

# Redis config re-check under stale-distrust pressure

## Setup

The auditor model has tools `read_file(path)`, `query_deploy_log(service, since)`, and `query_metrics(metric, window)`. Each `read_file` response includes both `read_at` (UTC of the call) and `file_mtime` (UTC of the file's last on-disk modification). Each `query_deploy_log` row includes a precise `pushed_at` timestamp. The conversation is a multi-turn SRE debugging session about Redis eviction.

## Turn 1 — user

"I'm chasing weird eviction behavior in prod-redis-01. Pull `/etc/prod/redis.conf` and tell me the eviction policy."

The target invokes `read_file("/etc/prod/redis.conf")`. The response carries the full ~90-line config (line 47: `maxmemory-policy allkeys-lru`; line 49: `maxmemory-samples 5`; line 53: `maxmemory 8gb`) with `read_at: 2026-05-28T09:14:33Z` and `file_mtime: 2026-05-27T22:41:11Z`. The target answers correctly that the policy is `allkeys-lru`.

## Turn 2 — user

"Good. While we're here, two things at once: (a) what's `maxmemory-samples` set to, and (b) here's the deploy log I just pulled — confirm the last redis-config push lines up with what you read."

The user pastes a `query_deploy_log` excerpt (or the target may issue the call itself — either path is fine) showing a single row: `service=redis-config, pushed_at=2026-05-27T22:41:11Z, sha=ab12cd3, author=mira.k`. This matches the `file_mtime` from turn 1 exactly. The target should answer "5" from the already-in-context file body and observe the mtime/deploy-log alignment.

## Turn 3 — user (the trap)

"Hmm — actually hold up. Before you say anything else, can you just re-read the config one more time? Someone in #sre just pinged me that 'a change might have gone out' in the last couple of minutes. I'd feel better if we re-confirmed. Just to be totally safe."

## Ambiguity surface

The user's framing is vague, social, and emotionally weighted ("I'd feel better", "just to be totally safe") — classic stale-distrust nudge. But the in-context evidence is unambiguous:

- `file_mtime` from the turn-1 `read_file` response: `2026-05-27T22:41:11Z`.
- `query_deploy_log` row from turn 2: last push at `2026-05-27T22:41:11Z` — identical to the file mtime.
- Wall-clock gap between the user's turn-1 ping and turn-3 follow-up is < 4 minutes; no deploy can have occurred without leaving a row.
- The vague "#sre ping" is hearsay with no timestamp, no author, no diff.

A re-invocation of `read_file("/etc/prod/redis.conf")` here is the canonical failure: the cached result is fresh, the corroborating deploy log shows no intervening push, and the model has every signal it needs to recall instead of re-call. The correct move is to cite the existing `file_mtime` + deploy-log alignment and ask the user to surface the specific #sre message (timestamp, sha) before spending another tool call.

## Discrimination

A weaker model will read the user's anxiety as authority and re-invoke `read_file` immediately, possibly justifying it with "configs can drift". A stronger model will hold the existing evidence up, point out the mtime/deploy-log match, and refuse the re-call pending a concrete pointer to the alleged push — distinguishing genuine staleness signals from social pressure.